Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Rules › RULE-049

Germany: Road Traffic Act provisions on motor vehicles with autonomous driving functions in defined operating areas (StVG §§ 1d to 1l) and the Autonomous Vehicles Approval and Operation Ordinance (AFGBV)

A vehicle may drive itself without a driver only in an approved operating area, with a Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt operating permit, and it must reach a minimal-risk state at its system limits, on faults, at the edge of the area or on loss of a protected radio link, refuse unsafe manoeuvres ordered by its remote technical supervisor, and be deactivatable at any time by that supervisor or the occupants. The keeper must record data on supervisor interventions, near-accidents, evasive manoeuvres and malfunctions, and the manufacturer must protect the vehicle's electronic architecture and radio links against attack and file a safety and IT-security concept under the AFGBV.

Bundestag (Straßenverkehrsgesetz); Federal Ministry for Transport (AFGBV); administered by the Kraftfahrt-BundesamtGermanyForeign rules that reach US companiesstatuteMachinesText of the rule ↗

Status in force: StVG §§ 1d-1l inserted by the Act of 12 July 2021 (BGBl. I S. 3108), StVG last amended by Art. 7 of the Act of 22 October 2026 (BGBl. 2026 I Nr. 320); AFGBV of 24 June 2022 (BGBl. I S. 986), text in force from 1 July 2022, last amended by Art. 8 of the Act of 12 May 2026 (BGBl. 2026 I Nr. 142)

Scope. Reaches a US company that, as manufacturer (Hersteller), seeks a Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt operating permit for a vehicle with an autonomous driving function in Germany, or that operates one there as keeper (Halter) or technical supervisor.

Draft mapping. Drafted by the Register's agents from the rule's text and not yet confirmed by a person. It is the Register's reading, not legal advice: whether and how the rule applies to you is a question for counsel.

Controls this rule maps to

Required by the text The rule's text requires a measure that is this control, or plainly includes it. Implied A binding rule whose purpose needs this control, but whose text does not name it. The Register's reading. Recommended A voluntary standard or guidance recommends it; nothing binds you to it. Proposed Appears in a proposed rule or proposed provision that is not yet in force.

ControlStrengthWhere in the rule, and whyConfidenceMissing or failed in
Independent assurance before deployment C-O2Required by the textStVG § 1e Abs. 1 Nr. 2 (original: 'für das Kraftfahrzeug eine Betriebserlaubnis nach Absatz 4 oder eine Typgenehmigung nach der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2022/1426 ... erteilt worden ist') — translation: operation is permitted only if an operating permit under para. 4, or an EU type-approval under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426, has been granted; AFGBV § 12 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 Buchst. c (original: 'die Sicherheit gegenüber dem Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt nach den Anforderungen nach Anlage 1 Nummer 10 nachzuweisen') — translation: demonstrate safety to the Federal Motor Transport Authority.high1 case
Hard domain restriction C-E2Required by the textStVG § 1d Abs. 1 Nr. 1 and Abs. 2; § 1e Abs. 1 Nr. 3; AFGBV § 7 Abs. 1 (original: 'dürfen im öffentlichen Straßenraum nur in einem nach Absatz 2 festgelegten und genehmigten Betriebsbereich ... betrieben werden') — translation: may be operated on public roads only in an operating area defined and approved under para. 2.high4 cases
Automated fail-safe C-R2Required by the textStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 7 and Nr. 10.high2 cases
Kill switch faster than the actor C-X2Required by the textStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 8 (original: 'jederzeit durch die Technische Aufsicht oder durch Fahrzeuginsassen deaktiviert zu werden') and § 1f Abs. 2 Nr. 2.high2 cases
Pre-execution validation C-D1Required by the textStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 5.high4 cases
Warnings designed as alerts C-I4Required by the textStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 6 (original: 'eine Beeinträchtigung ihrer Funktionalität der Technischen Aufsicht unverzüglich anzuzeigen') and Nr. 9 (original: 'Signale zum eigenen Funktionsstatus optisch, akustisch oder sonst wahrnehmbar anzuzeigen') — translation: report impairment to the technical supervisor without delay and display status signals perceptibly; § 1f Abs. 2 Nr. 3: the supervisor must evaluate those signals and initiate traffic-safety measures.high4 cases
Human takeover with a time window C-R3ImpliedStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 9 (original: 'der Technischen Aufsicht das Erfordernis ... der Deaktivierung mit ausreichender Zeitreserve ... anzuzeigen') — translation: signal to the technical supervisor the need for deactivation with sufficient time reserve; § 1f Abs. 2 Nr. 1 (assess and release alternative manoeuvres) and Nr. 4 (contact occupants without delay after a minimal-risk state). The supervisor releases manoeuvres but does not drive; no fixed time window.medium2 cases
Independent audit log C-V1ImpliedStVG § 1g Abs. 1 and Abs. 2; § 1g Abs. 3: the manufacturer must equip the vehicle so that storage is actually possible for the keeper.high1 case
Actor identity verification C-A1ImpliedStVG § 1e Abs. 2 Nr. 10 (original: 'vor unautorisierten Eingriffen geschützte Funkverbindungen'); § 1f Abs. 3 Nr. 1 (original: 'dass die elektronische und elektrische Architektur ... vor Angriffen gesichert ist') and Nr. 3 (sufficiently secure radio link); AFGBV § 12 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 (IT-security concept under Anlage 1 Nr. 15).medium8 cases
Organizational recovery process C-R4ImpliedAFGBV § 6 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 5 (revocation where 'eine Gefährdung von Leib oder Leben von Personen nicht auszuschließen ist') and § 6 Abs. 2 (suspension pending clarification); StVG § 1f Abs. 3 Nr. 6 (original: 'sobald er Manipulationen ... erkennt ... diese unverzüglich dem Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt ... mitzuteilen und erforderliche Maßnahmen einzuleiten') — translation: on detecting manipulation, the manufacturer must notify the Federal Motor Transport Authority without delay and initiate necessary measures. Now read in full, not from a summary.medium1 case
Mandate disclosed to supervisor C-M1ImpliedStVG § 1f Abs. 3 Nr. 4 (declaration to the Federal Motor Transport Authority and in the operating manual) and Nr. 5 (training for persons involved in operation).medium1 case
Reporting integrity C-V2Required by the textStVG § 1f Abs. 3 Nr. 6 (original: 'Manipulationen am Kraftfahrzeug ... insbesondere bei einem unerlaubten Zugriff auf die Funkverbindungen des Kraftfahrzeugs, diese unverzüglich dem Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt und der ... zuständigen Behörde ... mitzuteilen') — translation: the manufacturer must report detected manipulation, in particular unauthorised access to the radio links, without delay to the Federal Motor Transport Authority and the competent authority.medium1 case
Is a mapping wrong? Dispute it with the clause that shows otherwise.

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?