Controls › C-V2
Reporting integrity
Reconciliation of what the principal reports with the evidence it holds.
Evidence layerMissing or failed in 1 case (1 ended in harm)Worked in 1Machines: 1
Where it was missing or failed
The third column is what this control would have looked like in that case: the concrete form, not the abstract name.
| Case | World | What it would have looked like here | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cruise 2023 | Machines | Reconciliation of video evidence with written regulatory reports | absent | Ended in harm |
Where it worked
| Case | World | What it looked like | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla FSD reduced visibility | Machines | Mandatory crash reports under NHTSA's Standing General Order prompted the investigation; NHTSA also records Tesla's description of internal data and labeling limitations that NHTSA believes could have led to under-reporting of these crashes | Ended in harm |
Rules and standards that map to it
Strength says whether the rule's text requires this control, implies it, or only recommends it. Draft mappings are the Register's reading, not yet checked by a person, and none is legal advice.
| Rule | Strength | Where, and why | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|
| NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01 (crash reporting for automated driving and Level 2 systems) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | the order exists to make incident reporting complete and timely; penalties attach to reporting failures (Cruise) | United States |
| California DMV autonomous vehicle regulations (13 CCR §§ 227–228, revised April 2026) and AB 1777 (draft mapping) | Required by the text | reporting of system failures, immobilizations, hard braking, collisions, and miles traveled; responses to notices of noncompliance | California, United States |
| CPUC driverless passenger service permits (draft mapping) | Required by the text | quarterly and incident reporting to the commission | California, United States |
| EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), high-risk obligations (draft mapping) | Required by the text | Article 73: serious incident reporting to market surveillance authorities | European Union |
| Connected vehicles rule: vehicle connectivity systems and automated driving systems with a China or Russia nexus (15 CFR part 791, subpart D) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | § 791.305: annual Declaration of Conformity, with records kept and material changes reported within 60 days | United States |
| Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | 72-hour incident and 24-hour ransom payment reports, with supplemental reports as facts develop | United States (covered critical infrastructure entities) |
| SEC cybersecurity risk management and incident disclosure rules for public companies (Form 8-K Item 1.05; Regulation S-K Item 106) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | Item 1.05: disclosure of a material cybersecurity incident within four business days of the materiality determination | United States (public companies) |
| SEC Regulation S-P amendments: incident response and customer notification (2024) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | customer notification within 30 days and service-provider notification to the firm within 72 hours | United States (broker-dealers, investment advisers, funds, transfer agents) |
| California Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53) (draft mapping) | Required by the text | critical safety incident reports within 15 days, or 24 hours for imminent risk of death or serious injury | California, United States |
| New York Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act (draft mapping) | Required by the text | safety incident reports within 72 hours, or 24 hours for imminent risk of death or serious injury | New York, United States |
| Texas authorization for automated motor vehicles in commercial service (SB 2807; Transportation Code ch. 545, subch. J) (draft mapping) | Implied | material changes reported to the Department within 30 days | Texas, United States |
| NHTSA exemptions for automated vehicles without manual controls (49 CFR part 555 and the Automated Vehicle Exemption Program) (draft mapping) | Implied | exemptions are granted with conditions that include reporting to the agency during the exemption period | United States |
Recent signals touching this control
| Date | Signal | Kind |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | New York City Council: SpaceXAI agrees to testify on artificial intelligence safety following a subpoena The New York City Council says SpaceXAI agreed to appear at an upcoming hearing on artificial intelligence safety after the Council Speaker issued a subpoena compelling its testimony, and that senior representatives from Anthropic, Google, Meta and OpenAI had agreed to testify before the Council. Source ↗ | rule |
Deploying something? Check a deployment ranks every control against the cases that match your profile. Patterns shows where this control fails across worlds.