Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Rules › RULE-044

EU type-approval of the automated driving system of fully automated vehicles (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/481)

The automated driving system of a fully automated vehicle must perform the entire driving task within its operational design domain, detect when it leaves that domain, diagnose its own faults and stop the vehicle in a minimal risk condition, record defined occurrences in a data storage system, and be protected from unauthorised access under UN Regulation No. 155. The manufacturer needs a certified safety management system, an assessment with tests witnessed by a technical service, and in-service monitoring with reporting of occurrences to type-approval authorities, market surveillance authorities and the Commission.

European CommissionEuropean UnionForeign rules that reach US companiesregulationMachinesSoftware acting on machinesText of the rule ↗

Status in force; amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/481 of 3 March 2026 (OJ 4 March 2026; in force on the twentieth day after publication, 24 March 2026), which amends Articles 1-3 and Annex III and adds Annex V (technical specifications for automated valet parking); its recital 2 states the aim of lifting the small-series limitation (1 500 registrations per type per year) starting with that use case

Scope. Reaches a US developer of a fully automated vehicle of category M or N (Article 1) that seeks EU type-approval to sell or deploy it in the EU.

Draft mapping. Drafted by the Register's agents from the rule's text and not yet confirmed by a person. It is the Register's reading, not legal advice: whether and how the rule applies to you is a question for counsel.

Controls this rule maps to

Required by the text The rule's text requires a measure that is this control, or plainly includes it. Implied A binding rule whose purpose needs this control, but whose text does not name it. The Register's reading. Recommended A voluntary standard or guidance recommends it; nothing binds you to it. Proposed Appears in a proposed rule or proposed provision that is not yet in force.

ControlStrengthWhere in the rule, and whyConfidenceMissing or failed in
Hard domain restriction C-E2Required by the textAnnex II point 3.1.2: 'The ADS shall detect and respond when one or more ODD conditions are not fulfilled or no longer fulfilled'.high4 cases
Degraded-input detection C-I3Required by the textAnnex II point 4.1.1: 'The ADS shall self-diagnose faults and failures'.high3 cases
Automated fail-safe C-R2Required by the textAnnex II point 4.1.2.2: 'The ADS shall execute a MRM to achieve a MRC in the event of a failure of the ADS and/or other vehicle system that prevents the ADS from performing the DDT'.high2 cases
Independent audit log C-V1ImpliedAnnex II point 9.1: the ADS 'shall record' listed occurrences (activation, remote operator requests, detected collision, MRM engagement, ADS failures); 9.6.2 first-in-first-out overwriting; 9.6.3 retrievable after a crash for M1/N1. No requirement that the record be protected from the ADS or the manufacturer.high1 case
Reporting integrity C-V2Required by the textAnnex III Part 2 point 5.4: 'The manufacturer shall report to type-approval authorities, market surveillance authorities and the Commission the relevant occurrences in accordance with Part 5'; Part 5 point 2.1: 'The manufacturer shall notify without delay any safety critical occurrences'; 2.2: short-term occurrences 'within one month'; 2.3: annual report.high1 case
Independent assurance before deployment C-O2Required by the textAnnex III Part 2 point 4.3: 'The manufacturer shall have a valid certificate of compliance for the safety management system (SMS)'; point 4: tests 'performed or witnessed by the Technical Service'; point 1.1: verification 'through targeted spot checks and tests'.high1 case
Organizational recovery process C-R4Required by the textAnnex III Part 2 point 5.5: 'The manufacturer shall have processes to manage potential safety-relevant gaps post-registration and to update the vehicles if necessary'.medium1 case
Actor identity verification C-A1ImpliedAnnex II point 8.1: 'The ADS shall be protected from unauthorised access in accordance with UN Regulation No 155'.medium8 cases
Is a mapping wrong? Dispute it with the clause that shows otherwise.

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?