Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Rules › RULE-013

OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications

Names prompt injection, sensitive information disclosure, excessive agency, and improper output handling among the top risks for applications built on language models, with mitigations for each.

OWASP FoundationGuidance, no jurisdictionInternational standards and guidanceguidanceSoftware agentsAgents moving moneySoftware acting on machinesText of the rule ↗

Status 2025 edition

Draft mapping. Drafted by the Register's agents from the rule's text and not yet confirmed by a person. It is the Register's reading, not legal advice: whether and how the rule applies to you is a question for counsel.

Controls this rule maps to

Required by the text The rule's text requires a measure that is this control, or plainly includes it. Implied A binding rule whose purpose needs this control, but whose text does not name it. The Register's reading. Recommended A voluntary standard or guidance recommends it; nothing binds you to it. Proposed Appears in a proposed rule or proposed provision that is not yet in force.

ControlStrengthWhere in the rule, and whyConfidenceMissing or failed in
Retrieved content as data C-I1RecommendedLLM01 prompt injection: treat retrieved and user content as datahigh5 cases
Least-privilege credential scoped to task C-E1RecommendedLLM06 excessive agency: limit the extensions, permissions, and autonomy grantedhigh5 cases
Destructive-action gate C-E3Recommendedexcessive agency mitigations include human approval for high-impact actionsmedium5 cases
Independent audit log C-V1Recommendedlogging and monitoring of agent actionsmedium1 case
Is a mapping wrong? Dispute it with the clause that shows otherwise.

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?