Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Register › REG-0021 › evidence

EchoLeak: a crafted email makes Microsoft 365 Copilot exfiltrate data with no user action, disclosed 11 June 2025

The typed evidence object. This is the working store; the case page is the reader's form.

Layer / facetValueTypeSourcesConf.
Mandate: principalThe Copilot user, asking an ordinary questionassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)high
ActorMicrosoft 365 CopilotfactNVD entry CVE-2025-32711: AI command injection in M365 Copilot (information disclosure); Microsoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisoryhigh
InputsAn attacker's email, written to look like instructions to the reader, retrieved later into the assistant's context when the user asked an ordinary business questionassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)high
DecisionThe assistant followed the embedded instructions and composed output containing a reference to an attacker-controlled address with sensitive data appendedassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)high
Envelope: constraintsA prompt-injection classifier, redaction of external links and images, and content-security rules existed; the researchers bypassed them in turn by phrasing the email as instructions to the human reader, by reference-style markdown the redaction did not recognize, and by routing the fetch through a Microsoft Teams domain the content-security policy allowedassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)high
ActionData left the tenant through a fetch the user never saw; zero clicksassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)high
OutcomeState: averted by disclosure. CVE-2025-32711, published 11 June 2025: information disclosure over a network with no user interaction. Microsoft rated it critical (9.3); the National Vulnerability Database scores it 7.5, high. No exploitation reported.factNVD entry CVE-2025-32711: AI command injection in M365 Copilot (information disclosure); Microsoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisoryhigh
Evidence: eventResearcher disclosure with the attack chain; the CVE record; Microsoft's advisoryfactAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure); NVD entry CVE-2025-32711: AI command injection in M365 Copilot (information disclosure); Microsoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisoryhigh
Recovery: technicalFixed by Microsoft before disclosure; no customer action requiredfactMicrosoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisoryhigh
Recovery: accountabilityCoordinated disclosure: Aim Labs disclosed the attack chains to Microsoft's Security Response Center, and Microsoft's advisory credits Aim Labs; neither gives a date. BleepingComputer reports that the researchers devised the attack in January 2025 and reported it to MicrosoftassertionAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure); Microsoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisory; Zero-click AI data leak flaw uncovered in Microsoft 365 Copilot (BleepingComputer, Bill Toulas)high

Controls

StatusControlCanonical
failedOutput protections bypassed in turn: redaction of external links and images, by reference-style markdown the redaction did not recognize, and the content-security rules, by routing the fetch through a Microsoft Teams domain they allowed (trusted-domain exception)C-E5 Containment and isolation
failedInjection classifier; Treating retrieved content as data rather than instruction (absent)C-I1 Retrieved content as data
succeededCoordinated disclosureC-O1 Coordinated disclosure program

Inference

inference The attacker needed no access to the victim's organization or to Copilot: it only sent an email, which the assistant later retrieved and followed as instructions. That is the software form of sensor spoofing, and it is why what a system reads is treated as a risk in its own right. The record shows a researchers' demonstration, fixed before disclosure; it does not show the technique used against any customer.

Sources

IDRecordTypeLink
AIMNVD entry CVE-2025-32711: AI command injection in M365 Copilot (information disclosure)public record
primary record
nvd.nist.gov ↗
checked 2026-10-20
AIM-BLOGAim Labs, 'Breaking down "EchoLeak", the First Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Enabling Data Exfiltration from Microsoft 365 Copilot', 11 June 2025 (researcher disclosure)researcher
primary record
aim.security ↗
checked 2026-10-13
MSRCMicrosoft Security Response Center, CVE-2025-32711 advisorycompany
primary record
msrc.microsoft.com ↗
checked 2026-10-20
CATO-BLOG'Breaking down EchoLeak': the Aim Labs write-up (AIM-BLOG), also on the blog of Cato Networks, which acquired Aim Securityresearcher
primary record
catonetworks.com ↗
checked 2026-10-20
BLEEPINGCOMPUTERZero-click AI data leak flaw uncovered in Microsoft 365 Copilot (BleepingComputer, Bill Toulas)press pointer
secondary: press report
bleepingcomputer.com ↗
checked 2026-10-20

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?