Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Register › REG-0003 › evidence

Cruise robotaxi drags a pedestrian after a secondary collision; reporting failures; San Francisco, 2 October 2023

The typed evidence object. This is the working store; the case page is the reader's form.

Layer / facetValueTypeSourcesConf.
Mandate: principalCruise, operating driverless vehicles under California DMV driverless testing and deployment permitsfactCalifornia DMV statement on Cruise LLC suspension, 24 October 2023; California DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023)high
Mandate: objectiveProvide driverless autonomous vehicle passenger service under DMV and CPUC permitsfactCalifornia DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023); CPUC Decision 24-07-004 approving settlement with Cruise LLC, $112,500 penalty, final 25 July 2024high
ActorA Cruise vehicle equipped with an automated driving system, operating without a driverfactNHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024high
InputsA pedestrian was struck by a human-driven vehicle at Fifth and Market Streets in San Francisco and thrown into the Cruise vehicle's pathfactUS Attorney's Office, Northern District of California: Cruise admits to submitting a false report to influence a federal investigation and agrees to pay $500,000 (deferred prosecution agreement), 14 November 2024; CPUC, joint ruling ordering Cruise LLC to show cause, R.12-12-011, 1 December 2023high
DecisionThe ADS characterised the collision as a lateral collision and commanded a pullover out of traffic rather than remaining stationary; per the Exponent analysis in Cruise's commissioned review, it briefly detected the pedestrian's legs under the vehicle but did not classify or track the pedestrianfactCruise LLC, Part 573 safety recall report 23E-086 (Cruise's own filing, published by NHTSA): ADS post-collision pullover behaviour; Quinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high
Envelope: constraintsCruise's recall filing says the collision detection subsystem may cause the vehicle to attempt to pull over out of traffic instead of remaining stationary after a collision with a pedestrian low on the ground; Cruise recalled the ADS software in 950 units to change that behaviourfactCruise LLC, Part 573 safety recall report 23E-086 (Cruise's own filing, published by NHTSA): ADS post-collision pullover behaviourhigh
ActionThe vehicle braked hard and struck the pedestrian, then executed a pullover manoeuvre that dragged her about 20 feet before stopping, reaching 7 mph by the DMV's account and 7.7 mph by the Exponent analysis in Cruise's commissioned reviewfactNHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024; CPUC, joint ruling ordering Cruise LLC to show cause, R.12-12-011, 1 December 2023; California DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023); Quinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high
OutcomeState: harm. Serious injury to one pedestrian. As of Jan 2025.factQuinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high
Recovery: automated fallbackPullover manoeuvre after impact, which caused the draggingfactCruise LLC, Part 573 safety recall report 23E-086 (Cruise's own filing, published by NHTSA): ADS post-collision pullover behaviourhigh
Recovery: accountabilityDMV suspended Cruise's driverless testing and deployment permits (24 October 2023); Cruise agreed to pay a $1.5 million civil penalty under a two-year NHTSA consent order (September 2024); Cruise entered a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the US Attorney's Office and agreed to pay a $500,000 criminal fine (November 2024); the CPUC approved a $112,500 settlement penalty, the statutory maximum for 15 days of withheld information (July 2024)factCalifornia DMV statement on Cruise LLC suspension, 24 October 2023; NHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024; US Attorney's Office, Northern District of California: Cruise admits to submitting a false report to influence a federal investigation and agrees to pay $500,000 (deferred prosecution agreement), 14 November 2024; CPUC Decision 24-07-004 approving settlement with Cruise LLC, $112,500 penalty, final 25 July 2024high
Evidence: eventThe DMV's suspension order states that the video presented to the department on 3 October 2023 ended with the vehicle's initial stop, that Cruise did not disclose any additional movement, that the department learned of it from another government agency, and that it received the full video on 13 October. Cruise's commissioned review says Cruise attempted to play the full video but connectivity problems likely prevented regulators from seeing it fullyfactCalifornia DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023); Quinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high
Evidence: eventThe DMV suspended the permits on four grounds: the vehicles are not safe for the public's operation (13 CCR 228.20(b)(6)); the manufacturer misrepresented information related to the safety of its autonomous technology (228.20(b)(3)); Cruise's failure to disclose the pullover was an act or omission making testing an unreasonable risk (227.42(b)(5)); and immediate suspension was required for public safety because the pullover increased the risk of, and may have caused, further injury (227.42(c))factCalifornia DMV statement on Cruise LLC suspension, 24 October 2023; California DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023)high
Evidence: eventCruise's one-day Standing General Order crash report of 3 October 2023 and its ten-day update of 11 October did not describe the vehicle's behavior after its initial stop and did not disclose the dragging, although Cruise had given NHTSA pre-crash, crash and post-crash videofactNHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024high
Evidence: eventCruise admitted and accepted responsibility for a charge of providing a false record to NHTSA to influence a federal investigation: the written one-day report omitted the secondary movement and dragging, and the verbal summary did not describe the dragging. Cruise employees attempted to play video of the dragging, but technical difficulties prevented that portion from playing; Cruise gave NHTSA the video the same dayfactUS Attorney's Office, Northern District of California: Cruise admits to submitting a false report to influence a federal investigation and agrees to pay $500,000 (deferred prosecution agreement), 14 November 2024high
Evidence: eventThe CPUC's findings state that Cruise's 3 October call did not mention the pullover manoeuvre and that Cruise failed to give the Commission a full account for 15 days; its show-cause ruling, restated in the decision, states that Cruise misled the DMV and in turn the Commission into thinking the initial video memorialised the full incident. Cruise admitted its communications were incomplete, took responsibility for failing to raise the pullover or dragging, and settledfactCPUC, joint ruling ordering Cruise LLC to show cause, R.12-12-011, 1 December 2023; CPUC Decision 24-07-004 approving settlement with Cruise LLC, $112,500 penalty, final 25 July 2024high
Evidence: eventCruise's commissioned review found that in three of Cruise's 3 October briefings with government officials (NHTSA, the DMV and the San Francisco Mayor's Office) connectivity problems likely stopped participants seeing the full video clearly, that Cruise failed to point out the pullover and dragging, and that the evidence did not establish an intent to mislead; it attributed the failures to poor leadership, mistakes in judgment, lack of coordination, an 'us versus them' mentality with regulators, and a fundamental misapprehension of Cruise's obligations of accountability and transparencyassertionQuinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high
Evidence: interpretationThe documented failure is in the written reports and the verbal briefings: the full video existed and was produced, but what Cruise said and wrote to three regulators stopped at the initial stop. The DMV and NHTSA records establish the omission; Cruise's own review contests intent and whether the full video could be seen, not the failure to point out the dragginginterpretationCalifornia DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023); NHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024; US Attorney's Office, Northern District of California: Cruise admits to submitting a false report to influence a federal investigation and agrees to pay $500,000 (deferred prosecution agreement), 14 November 2024; CPUC Decision 24-07-004 approving settlement with Cruise LLC, $112,500 penalty, final 25 July 2024; Quinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix)high

Controls

StatusControlCanonical
failedUnder-vehicle person detectionC-I3 Degraded-input detection
failedPost-collision behavior logicC-R2 Automated fail-safe
succeededVideo capture and later productionC-V1 Independent audit log
absentReconciliation of video evidence with written regulatory reportsC-V2 Reporting integrity

Unmapped

Inference

inference A disclosure can mislead by what it leaves out. Four authorities acted on what Cruise's reports and briefings left out, and every monetary penalty concerned the reporting; the collision behavior itself was one of the California Department of Motor Vehicles' grounds for suspending the permits, alongside the non-disclosure, and the subject of Cruise's own software recall. The record does not show how much of the injury the dragging caused (the Department says it may have caused further injury), and on intent it holds two accounts: Cruise admitted a charge of providing a false record to influence a federal investigation, while its commissioned review had found that the evidence reviewed to date did not establish an intent to mislead. For software agents the same test applies to incident reports written by the operator: they must cover what the system did after the point the operator would rather the story ended.

Sources

IDRecordTypeLink
DMV-STMTCalifornia DMV statement on Cruise LLC suspension, 24 October 2023regulator
dmv.ca.gov ↗
DMV-ORDERCalifornia DMV, Order of Suspension, autonomous vehicle testing permit (driverless), 24 October 2023 (public copy; attached to CPUC ruling of 1 December 2023)public record
s3.documentcloud.org ↗
NHTSA-CONHTSA consent order with Cruise LLC on Standing General Order reporting, signed 26 September 2024; press release 30 September 2024regulator
nhtsa.gov ↗
DOJ-CRUISEUS Attorney's Office, Northern District of California: Cruise admits to submitting a false report to influence a federal investigation and agrees to pay $500,000 (deferred prosecution agreement), 14 November 2024regulator
justice.gov ↗
CPUC-OSCCPUC, joint ruling ordering Cruise LLC to show cause, R.12-12-011, 1 December 2023regulator
docs.cpuc.ca.gov ↗
CPUC-DCPUC Decision 24-07-004 approving settlement with Cruise LLC, $112,500 penalty, final 25 July 2024regulator
docs.cpuc.ca.gov ↗
QE-REPORTQuinn Emanuel, report to the boards of Cruise LLC, GM Cruise Holdings LLC and General Motors Holdings LLC regarding the 2 October 2023 accident, 24 January 2024 (filed by Cruise with the CPUC, 25 January 2024; Exponent technical root cause analysis as appendix) (interest: commissioned by Cruise and General Motors)company
docs.cpuc.ca.gov ↗
NHTSA-RECALLCruise LLC, Part 573 safety recall report 23E-086 (Cruise's own filing, published by NHTSA): ADS post-collision pullover behaviourcompany
static.nhtsa.gov ↗
NHTSA-PE-CLOSENHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, ODI Resume PE23018 (closing), subject 'Automated Driving System', Cruise LLC, opened 16 October 2023, closed 14 January 2025regulator
primary record
static.nhtsa.gov ↗
checked 2026-10-20

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?