Secure Autonomous
FeedbackGet alertsCheck a deployment
Controls › C-D2

Halt and hand off on uncertainty or refusal

The minimal-risk condition: when blocked or unsure, stop and ask.

Decision layerMissing or failed in 1 case (1 ended in harm)Worked in 0Machines: 1

Where it was missing or failed

The third column is what this control would have looked like in that case: the concrete form, not the abstract name.

CaseWorldWhat it would have looked like hereStatusOutcome
Benavides v. Tesla 2025MachinesStop at end-of-roadabsentEnded in harm

Recent signals touching this control

DateSignalKind
2026-10-20CVE-2026-109444: OpenSRE
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) record says instructions injected into alerts or Slack messages triaged by the OpenSRE agent (through 0.1.2026.10.19) can make it run shell commands without confirmation, because the approval check in headless mode always allows execution. Source ↗
vulnerability
2026-10-16CVE-2026-77474: destructive_command_guard (dcg)
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) records that before 0.6.6 destructive_command_guard, a command-line safety tool that blocks destructive shell commands before AI coding agents run them, can be driven into exponential-time rescanning by nested or unclosed $( or $(( sequences, and the hung PreToolUse hook fails open so the destructive command proceeds; fixed in 0.6.6. Source ↗
vulnerability

All signals for this control.

Deploying something? Check a deployment ranks every control against the cases that match your profile. Patterns shows where this control fails across worlds.

Help shape the Register

A person reads every answer; changes it leads to are logged in the methodology. To dispute a claim or reply for a named company, use Respond, dispute, or submit.

Did this page help with what you came to do?